Democratic Television in The Netherlands: Two Curious Cases of Alternative Media as Counter-Technologies

Authors

  • Tom Slootweg Research Centre for Historical Studies, University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts, Oude Kijk in ’t Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK, Groningen
  • Susan Aasman Research Centre for Historical Studies, University of Groningen, Faculty of Arts, Oude Kijk in ’t Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK, Groningen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2015.jethc079

Keywords:

counter-technologies, alternative media history, media participation, media archaeology, democratisation, broadcast television, amateur film and video, punk project, personal cinema

Abstract

For this article, the authors retrieved two curious cases of non-conformist TV from the archives of the Netherlands Institute of Sound and Vision. Being made in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the two cases represent an alternative history of broadcast television in the Netherlands. Whereas Neon (1979–1980) aimed to establish a punk-inspired DIY video culture, Ed van der Elsken (1980, 1981) strived for an expressive amateur film culture. The authors propose to regard these cases as two different experiments on participation in and through media. By conceptualising amateur film and video as counter-technologies, the discursive expectations around their democratic potential can be explored further.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-09

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 7 (2015): TV Archaeologies

Section

Discoveries

License

Copyright (c) 2015 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).